The theorem showing that the theory determined by the standard model of arithmetic, , is undecidable and consequently not decidably axiomatizable (this means that
, for some
consisting of axioms of arithmetic, like those of Peano Arithmetic or one of it’s extensions) can be made stronger by showing that
, the set of indices of sentences that are true in
, is not definable over
, which means that
is not effectively enumerable. This is known as Tarski’s Theorem on the undefinability of truth.
Now set up the (provably effectively computable) function , which returns the least number
such that
is a formula of
.
In the next update I’ll discuss the proof of Tarski’s Theorem and move into the corollary that Hellman uses to give an example of determination without reduction.